PT-AM-CPE Test Objectives Pdf & Advanced PT-AM-CPE Testing Engine

Wiki Article

What's more, part of that DumpsReview PT-AM-CPE dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Uljhnw8jLQajVW87lrauQ64U3D0STS7T

Most IT workers prefer to choose our online test engine for their PT-AM-CPE exam prep because online version is more flexible and convenient. With the help of our online version, you can not only practice our PT-AM-CPE Exam PDF in any electronic equipment, but also make you feel the atmosphere of PT-AM-CPE actual test. The exam simulation will mark your mistakes and help you play well in PT-AM-CPE practice test.

DumpsReview almost aimed to meet the needs of all candidates who want to pass the PT-AM-CPE exam. If someone who don’t have enough time to prepare for their exam, our website provide they with test answers which only need 20-30 hours to grasp; If someone who worry about failed the PT-AM-CPE Exam, our website can guarantee that they can get full refund. In summary, the easiest way to prepare for PT-AM-CPE certification exam is to complete PT-AM-CPE study material.

>> PT-AM-CPE Test Objectives Pdf <<

Advanced PT-AM-CPE Testing Engine | Valid Test PT-AM-CPE Braindumps

Are you still worried about whether or not our PT-AM-CPE materials will help you pass the exam? Are you still afraid of wasting money and time on our materials? Don’t worry about it now, our PT-AM-CPE materials have been trusted by thousands of candidates. They also doubted it at the beginning, but the high pass rate of us allow them beat the PT-AM-CPE at their first attempt. What most important is that your money and exam attempt is bound to award you a sure and definite success with 100% money back guarantee. You can claim for the refund of money if you do not succeed to pass the PT-AM-CPE Exam and achieve your target. We ensure you that you will be paid back in full without any deduction.

Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Extending Services Using OAuth2-Based Protocols: This domain addresses integrating applications with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, securing OAuth2 clients with mutual TLS and proof-of-possession, transforming OAuth2 tokens, and implementing social authentication.
Topic 2
  • Installing and Deploying AM: This domain encompasses installing and upgrading PingAM, hardening security configurations, setting up clustered environments, and deploying PingOne Advanced Identity Platform to the cloud.
Topic 3
  • Enhancing Intelligent Access: This domain covers implementing authentication mechanisms, using PingGateway to protect websites, and establishing access control policies for resources.
Topic 4
  • Federating Across Entities Using SAML2: This domain covers implementing single sign-on using SAML v2.0 and delegating authentication responsibilities between SAML2 entities.
Topic 5
  • Improving Access Management Security: This domain focuses on strengthening authentication security, implementing context-aware authentication experiences, and establishing continuous risk monitoring throughout user sessions.

Ping Identity Certified Professional - PingAM Exam Sample Questions (Q88-Q93):

NEW QUESTION # 88
Which of the following multi-factor authentication protocols are supported by PingAM?
A) Open authentication
B) Security questions
C) Web authentication
D) Universal 2nd factor authentication
E) Push authentication

Answer: A

Explanation:
PingAM 8.0.2 provides a robust framework for Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) centered around modern, secure protocols and the Intelligent Access (Authentication Trees) engine. When discussing supported "protocols" in the context of MFA in PingAM documentation, the focus is on standardized methods for secondary verification.
The primary supported MFA pillars in PingAM 8.0.2 are:
Open Authentication (OATH): AM supports the OATH standards, specifically TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password) and HOTP (HMAC-based One-Time Password). This is implemented through the "OATH" authentication nodes, allowing users to use apps like ForgeRock Authenticator, Google Authenticator, or YubiKeys in OATH mode.
Web Authentication (WebAuthn): This is the implementation of the FIDO2 standard. It allows for passwordless and secure second-factor authentication using biometrics (like TouchID/FaceID) or hardware security keys (like YubiKeys). It is the successor to older standards and is natively supported via WebAuthn nodes.
Push Authentication: This is a proprietary but highly secure protocol used specifically with the ForgeRock/Ping Authenticator app. It allows a "Push" notification to be sent to a registered mobile device, which the user then approves or denies.
Why others are excluded from the selection: While PingAM supports Security Questions (KBA) and Universal 2nd Factor (U2F), they are often categorized differently in the 8.0.2 documentation. Security Questions are considered a "User Self-Service" or "Legacy" validation method rather than a modern MFA protocol. U2F is technically superseded by and included within the WebAuthn framework in PingAM 8.0.2. Thus, the most accurate grouping of distinct, core MFA protocols supported in the current version is A, C, and E, making Option C the correct answer.


NEW QUESTION # 89
An OpenID Connect application makes a request for an ID token with the openid and profile scope. Which set of claim attributes are available with the profile scope?

Answer: A

Explanation:
PingAM 8.0.2 adheres to the OpenID Connect Core 1.0 specification regarding standard scopes and claims. When a client requests the profile scope, the OpenID Provider (PingAM) is expected to return a specific set of claims that describe the user's basic profile.
According to the PingAM documentation on "Understanding OpenID Connect Scopes and Claims" and the default OIDC Claims Script (which maps internal LDAP attributes to OIDC claims):
The standard claims associated with the profile scope are strictly defined with lowercase, snake_case naming conventions. The default set includes:
name: The user's full name.
given_name: The user's first name.
family_name: The user's surname or last name.
middle_name: (Optional)
nickname: (Optional)
preferred_username: (Optional)
profile: URL to the profile page.
picture: URL to an image.
website: URL.
gender: (Optional)
birthdate: (Optional)
zoneinfo: Timezone.
locale: The user's preferred language/locale.
updated_at: Timestamp.
Option C is the only choice that correctly identifies the snake_case format (given_name, family_name, locale) required by the specification. Options A and B use camelCase or inconsistent naming that does not match the OIDC standard or PingAM's default mapping script. Option D includes preferred_locale, which is incorrect; the standard claim name for a user's language preference in OIDC is simply locale.


NEW QUESTION # 90
If there is a need to reset a registered device over the REST API, which one of the following statements is incorrect?

Answer: C

Explanation:
In PingAM 8.0.2, device management is a critical part of the Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) lifecycle. When a user registers a device for Push, OATH, or WebAuthn, that information is stored as a part of their identity profile. There are many scenarios where a device might need to be reset-for example, if a phone is lost, if the ForgeRock/Ping Authenticator app is reinstalled, or if an HOTP (HMAC-based One-Time Password) counter becomes desynchronized beyond the allowed window.
According to the PingAM documentation on "Managing Devices for MFA" and the "REST API for Device Management":
Administrator Capabilities: Administrators have the authority to manage device profiles for any user. They can list, rename, or delete (reset) device profiles using the /json/realms/root/realms/[realm]/users/[username]/devices endpoint. This is vital for helpdesk scenarios (Option D and B).
User Self-Service (The Incorrect Statement C): Statement C is technically incorrect because PingAM's REST API specifically supports self-service device management. An authenticated end-user has the permission to manage their own devices. They can call the /json/realms/root/realms/[realm]/users/[username]/devices endpoint using their own valid SSO token to delete their own registered devices. This allows organizations to build self-service portals where users can "Unpair" a lost device without calling support (Option A).
The internal security of PingAM ensures that while a regular user can only access their own device sub-resource, an administrator with the appropriate amAdmin or Delegate Admin privileges can access the resources of all users. Therefore, the claim that only administrator accounts can use the REST API for these actions is false and contradicts the "User Self-Service" philosophy built into the PingAM 8 API architecture.


NEW QUESTION # 91
When the OATH Registration node's OATH Algorithm property is set to TOTP in an authentication tree, which node needs to have the same value set?

Answer: B

Explanation:
In PingAM 8.0.2, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) using the OATH standard supports two primary algorithms: TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password) and HOTP (HMAC-based One-Time Password).14 For an authentication journey to function correctly, the "Registration" phase (where the user's device and AM agree on a secret and algorithm) and the "Verification" phase (where AM checks the submitted code) must be perfectly synchronized.
According to the "Authentication Node Reference" for the OATH Token Verifier node and OATH Registration node:
Both nodes contain a configuration property named OATH Algorithm.15 This property determines how the six- or eight-digit code is generated and validated. If the OATH Registration node is configured to set up a user for TOTP, it will generate a QR code containing the TOTP parameters for the user's authenticator app.
When that user later attempts to log in, the OATH Token Verifier node (Option A) must also be set to TOTP.16 If the verifier is accidentally set to HOTP (which uses a counter rather than a time step), the validation will consistently fail because the server will be looking for a counter-based value while the app is providing a time-based value.
Other nodes like the Recovery Code Collector Decision node (Option B) or OATH Device Storage node (Option D) handle subsequent or separate tasks (like account recovery or writing the final profile to LDAP) and do not directly participate in the real-time OATH mathematical validation logic. Thus, the OATH Token Verifier is the mandatory counterpart that must match the registration's algorithm setting.


NEW QUESTION # 92
In order to support rollback in case of a failed PingAM upgrade in a two server PingDS environment, what PingDS safety measure can be configured?

Answer: B

Explanation:
Upgrading PingAM 8.0.2 in an environment with multiple PingDS (Directory Server) instances requires a careful strategy to ensure data integrity and to allow for an immediate Rollback if the upgrade fails or introduces instability.6 According to the PingAM "Plan for Rollback" and "Upgrade in a Replicated Environment" documentation, the recommended safety measure involves isolating one of the data store nodes to act as a "time-capsule" of the pre-upgrade state. The process is as follows:
Stop Replication: Before starting the upgrade, administrators should disable or stop replication between the PingDS nodes. This prevents any schema changes or data modifications performed during the AM upgrade from being propagated to the backup node.
Isolate a Node: One PingDS instance is shut down or taken out of the load balancer rotation. This instance remains in its original, healthy state.
Perform the Upgrade: The PingAM upgrade is performed against the remaining active PingDS instance. If the upgrade involves schema updates (which is common when moving to version 8.0.2), only the active node's data is modified.
Rollback Path: If the upgrade fails, the administrator can simply shut down the "corrupted" upgraded environment and restart the isolated PingDS instance along with the original PingAM WAR file. Because replication was stopped, the isolated node still contains the original configuration and user data.
Option D is the only answer that correctly identifies this "safety-net" architecture. Option A is risky because a failed upgrade would corrupt both instances. Option C is incomplete because simply "starting up" the shutdown instance after an upgrade doesn't account for how you handle the discrepancy between the upgraded and non-upgraded nodes. The goal is to keep the shutdown instance as a valid, un-touched recovery point.


NEW QUESTION # 93
......

Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE preparation materials will be the good helper for your qualification certification. We are concentrating on providing high-quality authorized PT-AM-CPE study guide all over the world so that you can clear exam one time. As we all know, the preparation process for an exam is very laborious and time- consuming. We had to spare time to do other things to prepare for Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE Exam, which delayed a lot of important things.

Advanced PT-AM-CPE Testing Engine: https://www.dumpsreview.com/PT-AM-CPE-exam-dumps-review.html

P.S. Free & New PT-AM-CPE dumps are available on Google Drive shared by DumpsReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Uljhnw8jLQajVW87lrauQ64U3D0STS7T

Report this wiki page